diff --git a/Session07-apr07/README.md b/Session07-apr07/README.md
index 3014ab14ef9715db600feae78a976f0831586acc..c781a36b01b82d73cd28acfed5d3ded3de37a1ed 100644
--- a/Session07-apr07/README.md
+++ b/Session07-apr07/README.md
@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ The reasons for the current deficit can be found mainly in two fields:
 
 One reason why text-based-sources are currently so dominant in scientific History can be found looking at accessibility. Written sources can easily be replicated digitally without losing a lot of their - what I'll be calling it - **source-value** in comparison with the original. Thanks to the internet they can be easily distributed around the world with two clicks. 
 
-This is not the case for objects. The digital representation in form of database entries has lost of **source-value** in comparision with the experience one might have when actually the the object in front them and being able to feel it. For an example of a typical database entry of an objects take a look at the [online archive of the British Museum](https://research.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/search.aspx).
+This is not the case for objects. The digital representation in form of database entries has lost a lot of **source-value** in comparision with the experience one might have when actually the the object in front them and being able to feel it. For an example of a typical database entry of an objects take a look at the [online archive of the British Museum](https://research.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/search.aspx).
 
 #### Pedagogy
 
-The other reason why *Objects* only play a minor role in the historical source selection is, that in most cases it's simply not taught in University. I personally had to get out of University to realize that there is a lot more than just texts, which can be used as historical sources. I've talked with other students about it and their experience was similar. Admittedly, working with *Objects* as sources is in most cases more abstract and difficult than using texts, but this shouldn't be a reason not to do it, as there is much to gain. 
+The other reason why *Objects* only play a minor role in the historical source selection is, that in most cases it's simply not taught in University. I personally had to get out of University to realize that there is a lot more than just texts, which can be used as historical sources. I've talked with other students about it and their experience was similar. Admittedly, working with *Objects* as sousrces is in most cases more abstract and difficult than using texts, but this shouldn't be a reason not to do it, as there is much to gain. 
 
 ## The Project *Feeling the Past* (Working Title)